Sunday, April 8, 2007

Delicatessen - Noir comedy with horror or dystopia with comedy?

Delicatessen (1991)
Language:French
Director: Jean Paul Jeunet, Marc Caro
Actors:Jean Claude Dreyfus, Dominique Pinon, Marie-Laure Dougnac,Karin Viard

A dark(both in theme and setting) comedy set in a post-apocalytic France with rampant food, water and housing shortages. The hero(Pinon) is an out-of-work joker [ mainly because his partner, a chimp, was eaten up by hungry hordes] looking both for work and a place to stay. Answering an ad placed in the papers, he arrives at the hotel/hostel owned and run by the butcher(Dreyfus). Accepted on arrival and given a room and board, with the condition that he work as an odd-job man for the building, he takes up residence. Little does he realise that his predecessor in the same position was fattened up and then killed to be fed, as meat, to the apartment building's residents. For food shortages and the climate are so bad that no vegetables grow and even if they do, are too exorbtantly priced for common consumption.

The directors don't dwell on what caused the catastrophe, teasing us instead with glimpses of how totally society has collapsed: the cannibalism of the apartment seems like an accepted practice and very few, if any, have serious qualms about it; the atmosphere is smoky and dark, with only shaded glimpses of the sun; there is a revolution underway in opposition to the Government, lead by the Frogmen who live in the sewers of the city this is set in( mostly Paris).

The residents of the building are also character studies in themsleves - the family with their two rascally kids and a grandmother; the couple with the neurotic wife supposedly imagining voices instructing her to commit suicide and the husband in love with her; the butcher's daughter(Dougnac) who is disgusted by but powerless to stop the cannibalism; the two tradesmen- one of whom is secretly in love with the neurotic woman; and the sultry vixen( Karin Viard in a sumptuous performance) who pays for her rent and food by granting the butcher/owner sexual favours.

The clown enters this milieu and soon, through his charm and manners, as also the sympathy she feels for his intended fate, has won over the butcher's daughter. [There are episodes in between furhter fleshing out the building's characters, especially the butcher's and the quasi-moral dilemmas he faces and his justifications when his daughter confronts him with how horrible his policy is. His meditations on his options and motives are true enough and might drive most of us when faced with as big a crisis of survival as in the movie -food for thought here] This is where the movie gets interesting - Dougnac devises a plot to save the clown but, watching him get friendly with Viard, calls it off. However, the plan, set in motion with the Frogmen's help, is too far advanced to be called off but goes awry. :)

The extended denouement, totally harebrained and thrilling at the same time, ties up most loose ends and saves Pinon for his heroine and from the butcher's cleaver. The movie ends on a positive note with Pinon and Dougnac playing the cello on the rooftop as the air finally begins to clear, a sign of chaging winds and times.

All in all, though a bit long, the movie's characters are all finely sketched - no one-dimensional characters here. And each character, from the neurotic woman to the butcher, is given enough space to develop and, if not convince, at least evince sympathy from us for their characters. The directors also pose and raise profound questions on how present-day society would function, if at all, in a post-apocalyptic world and how most of what we do now is dependent on such a frail foundation. Food for thought, certainly. The masterstroke of the directors, though, is that they blend all this seamlessly with comedy - from Dougnac's shortsighted fumblings when she tries to win Pinon over( and his attempts to help her) and the Frogmen's absolute ineptness and adherence to near-schoolboyish ideas of how to conduct operations in secret. lol moments abound , side by side with sit-up-straight-and- think-what-you'd-do-in-this-situation-before-judging moments. Food for thought and ammo for laughter, with a yummy Karin Viard thrown in for good measure - me likey! Go watch this movie, people!

P.S: Random trivia - Jeunet, one of the directors, is also the director of Amelie - another awesome French movie that blends comedy, romance and philosophy.

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

Stark reality tempered by humour!

Afghanistan '76- a nation of orchards, peaceful vistas and strong mountain people. Or Afghanistan '06 - a nation of warlords, extremist Islam, deserts and widespread suffering. Are they two visions of a single country that, to quote Kipling, "the twain shall never meet"? While we may never,sadly, know the answer, the movie "Kabul Express" is a great way to look into contemporary Afghanistan, its people's suffering and courage and the twin ravages of war and famine inflicted on this once-beautiful and peaceful country.[ Though, I hasten to add, our vision of 'peace' might be tempered by merely two centuries of peace - warlords and war were a way of life for long before that there]

The story is simplicity itself - two journos(Warsi and Abraham) who visit Afghanistan to film a documentary and are waylaid / kidnapped by an escaping Taliban along the way. The Taliban warrior, initially portrayed one-dimensionally as pure evil, gradually acquires depth and, towards the end, one feels for the man.

So, too, are the Afghan police - initially overwhelmingly the good guys - whose later behaviour begs the question of whether black and white are ever clearly drawn in the world.The American journalist is just eye candy and has no real role to play escept as the trigger for the Taliban's outbursts and his eventual softening, as he sees his daughter in her.

The Paki border post , manned by two up-from-the-ranks subedars and one lieutenant, depicts the realities , or falsehoods, we are forced to live with every day. Having receved orders to seal the border, the lieutenant refuses to even accept, at his subedars' suggestion, that there might be Paki soldiers left behind in Afghanistan who might be making their way home after assisting the Taliban. This portrays the attitude of officialdom in Pakistan who refuse to accept their tacit and implicit support of the Taliban while the subedars' concern for their fellow-soldiers reflects ground realities and the truths that we blind ourselves to.

Without giving too much of the story away, let it suffice to say that the Talib commandeers the Indians' transport and tries to cross the border back into Pakistan. This journey is punctuated by oft-humourous exchanges between the Indians and the Talib - the one with Warsi insisting that Kapil was the greatest allrounder and the Talib refusing to accept any other than Imran was priceless and some moving exchanges between the Talib and the native driver regarding the Taliban's contribution, or lack thereof, to Afghnistan's state today.

Throughout, we are treated to glorious vistas of bleak landscapes, windswept and barren mountains, arid plains - in short, glorious scenery. I almost want to go there just to hike there.

Simultaneously, there are some really moving shots of crippled children( the victims of the 1000s of landmines sown during the wars) and begging widows ( forced to beg as they are not allowed to work in any other profession). As a tourism brochure / ground realities documentary, this takes the cake.

Warsi's comic timing is brilliant, Abraham looks and acts like excess baggage brought on to lure women to watch, the native driver and the Talib perform stellar renderings of their characters while the scenery, social situations and ground realities are spot on, at least from an Indian point of view.

My rating : 3.5 out of 5. A definite worth-a-watch.

Watch out for the road-blocking donkey!!! :)

Tuesday, December 19, 2006

A li'l corollary in addition to all the rules

Good set of rules :)
And lets also let other members know of the source of the movies we see... so that if someone is interested, they can be directed to the source... what say?

Monday, December 18, 2006

Ground law(s) !:)

Simple rules...er...suggestions to follow:

1. Keep reviews in English
2. Review any movie / pl ay on Earth ( for now. We can expand to pan-galactic reviews later)
3. No probs abt language of movie/play - be it Tutsi,Mongolian,Iroquois(dont think they have movies but who knows? ) or Kannada.:)
4. Avoid expressing too negative a sentiment :) i.e. with choice words that shall not be mentioned :)
5. Keep it humourous - no political/national/regional overtones, please.
6. Comments are welcome,and invited, on any review - but rules 4 and 5 hold there,too.
7. When reviewing, please indicate language, year and name (of the movie,I mean) clearly in the post even if it is titled otherwise.
8. Add a 'Things to watch out for' section whenever possible
9. Movie previews welcome,too
10. No more rules shall be allowed(unless there is a popular uprising)